Those undertaking the pilot project were enthusiastic about the benefits that the Chromebooks and Google Apps could provide to enhance learning and teaching, even though the pilot only lasted one term the opportunities for embedding technology into curriculum delivery were deemed apparent. As one participant explained his view of the benefits in these terms, they
“help one to one engagement with the lesson and give (children) more opportunity for independent learning”,( they provide) “opportunities to engage in lessons through devices and services in more ad hoc manner. I think it opens up more opportunities to learn in the way (some children) may feel more comfortable with..”
This approach to a more seamless provision of technology is implicated as one of the factors that will allow the development of ‘powerful new ways of thinking’ (Jacobsen et al., 2002 p.366) that are deemed important for effective learning.
Technology was also seen as providing a way of engaging children and “capturing their imagination” by one participant, and as all education processes explore the need for motivation if learning is going to occur (Condie and Munroe, 2007) technology can be seen as a way of providing that motivation. This was perhaps best illustrated by the teacher who talked about the poor writer in her class, who could now through access to the Chromebook not only be motivated to produce more writing, but also because the device was flexible remain with his peers working rather than have to be at a PC away from the other children. However, it was also noted that all the children felt the Chromebooks and Google Apps helped them in their learning.
Using technology in this more flexible way was seen to be developing essential life skills and open up new possibilities for children with a teacher reporting how one year four child had declared
“I really want to be a computer programmer if I can’t be a computer programmer I’ll be a doctor – what a choice – but it enables them to make those decisions, I think it opens their world to them”.
This insight was shared as recognition of the transformative effects that education can have upon children when they begin to feel empowered and confident in their learning.
To truly be effective the move to working in the cloud requires a cultural shift within not just individual schools, but across the education sector in order to overcome issues such as intra school moderation, if children’s work is in the cloud and not all paper based. Both schools recognised the issues of convincing a whole staff team to embrace a “new mind set” and had thought about how these might be overcome in their particular situations. One school suggested it needed a whole school approach to training and implementation to avoid resistance in staff some of whom were seen to be “embedded and …set in their ways so I suppose the culture change has to come in”. They went on to explore what they felt might be the implications of an approach that was not whole school by talking about possible inequalities in the student experience if some of the school are resistant to embrace new ways of working.
The argument here for equality of opportunity is understandable but not the only approach that could be considered. The other teacher suggested that following the pilot they were looking to create a model that built upon the children’s own expertise with the tools as they progress through the school. This approach does require that teachers are comfortable working with children who may in the initial stages be the experts (Gahala, n.d.) and also requires a model that provides the flexibility for the teacher experts to demonstrate and support new ways of working. Where the expertise lies in the teaching staff and how that can be shared e.g. peer observation of practice, is therefore also one of the factors that will contribute to changing cultures within school. Staff in both pilots acknowledged that it would have been difficult to do what they did without the onsite support from the university in the early stages. The recognition that engaging with any new technology is a sacrifice of time that could be spent learning content is part of the cost/ benefit analysis, but once children have learnt how to use, care for and respect a tool then teachers can be supported in understanding how they can deliver content with it. In this instance the move is not just to a new piece of hardware but embracing a new way of working in the cloud which is requiring a ‘new approach to pedagogy’ to be developed (Codie and Munroe, 2007 p.76).
In conclusion therefore the pilot has indicated that using Chromebooks can provide in class access to technology quickly and easily. It has been suggested that it is a flexible resource that can be used to support children’s learning and motivation. The Google Apps suite was seen as a positive tool that could be used to deliver most of the curriculum, notably topic and literacy, and had functions to support teachers with effective planning and both formative and summative assessment opportunities. The collaborative nature of the tool was seen as very positive for enhancing a range of learning opportunities and providing children with independent learning occasions as well as helping them to develop life skills and digital citizenship. The pilot was therefore a success with both schools already having purchased some Chromebooks instead of traditional alternatives. The success of the roll out now depends upon the strategies and support for the staff team to enable them to embrace the culture shift and begin to confidently embed the technology within their classroom practice.
The full report can be found
here